Raul Trevino Lara Jr. v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                             NUMBER 13-14-00123-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    RAUL TREVINO LARA JR.,                                                      Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                          Appellee.
    On appeal from the 275th District Court
    of Hidalgo County, Texas.
    ORDER ABATING APPEAL
    Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria
    Order Per Curiam
    This cause is before the Court on two motions filed by appellee, the State of Texas.
    Appellee has filed:    (1) a “Motion for Release of Particular Reporter’s Record
    Transcripts,” (2) a “Motion for Unsealing of Certain Reporter’s Record Volume,” and (3) a
    Motion for Abatement of Appeal.” These motions are not opposed by appellant, Raul
    Trevino Lara Jr. As stated herein, we abate and remand this cause to the trial court for
    proceedings pertaining to the preparation of the record.
    According to the appellee’s motion for release, the bound reporter’s record
    volumes for this cause as filed and maintained by the District Clerk of Hidalgo County,
    Texas are “misnumbered and are incomplete in that they do not memorialize all
    proceedings in the trial court.” Further, the portable memory device submitted to and
    maintained by the District Clerk does not include transcripts of all proceedings in the trial
    court.    Appellee thus states that the record currently fails to contain all information
    necessary for it to prepare a brief in this matter and requests that we direct the Clerk of
    this Court to release the reporter’s records as filed in this Court for the proceedings in the
    trial court conducted on December 20, 2012 and June 17, 2013, or in the alternative, to
    direct the court reporter to file those same records with the District Clerk.
    According to appellee’s motion for unsealing of a certain reporter’s record volume,
    a specific volume of the reporter’s record is sealed and the “District Clerk of Hidalgo
    County, Texas, will not disclose the nature or substance of the sealed record volume.”
    Appellee thus requests that we allow it to examine the sealed record, and further requests
    that if the sealed record is not within the appellate record, that we direct the District Clerk
    to forward the record to this Court for filing. We note that the record as currently filed
    with this Court contain a sealed record regarding a hearing held on December 16, 2013
    pertaining to the disqualification of a juror.
    By motion for abatement, appellee seeks to abate this appeal until a supplemental
    reporter’s record has been filed. According to the appellee, the current record fails to
    include any exhibits offered into evidence and admitted at the suppression hearing.
    2
    We previously abated this case because the reporter’s record was incomplete.
    Since that time, numerous volumes have been filed with this Court. However, based on
    the motions currently subject to consideration, the record as filed with the District Clerk is
    not the same record that was filed with this Court as the appellate record. See TEX. R.
    APP. P. 34.6(h) (“In a criminal case in which a party requests a reporter’s record, the court
    reporter must prepare a duplicate of the reporter’s record and file it with the trial court
    clerk.”). The two sets of records should be the same. See 
    id. This situation
    requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further delay and
    to preserve the parties’ rights.     See 
    id. R. 37.3(a)(1).
        Accordingly, this appeal is
    ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court. Upon remand, the judge of the
    trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given and conduct a hearing to determine
    if the reporter’s record is complete and accurate and shall make appropriate findings
    regarding this issue. See 
    id. R. 34.6(e),(f).
    The trial court shall also determine which
    portions of the record are sealed and why, and whether the parties to this appeal should
    be given access to the sealed records. Otherwise, the trial court shall determine what
    steps are necessary to ensure the prompt preparation of a complete reporter’s record and
    shall enter any orders required to avoid further delay, to preserve the parties’ rights, and
    to ensure that all copies of the appellate record are identical and complete.
    The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and orders and cause them to be
    included in a supplemental clerk's record which should be submitted to the Clerk of this
    Court within thirty days from the date of this order. Appellee’s motion for release of the
    reporter’s records, motion for unsealing, and motion for abatement are GRANTED in part
    3
    to the extent specified in this order of abatement and DENIED in part as to all other relief
    requested.
    It is so ordered.
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed the
    30th day of June, 2015.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-14-00123-CR

Filed Date: 7/2/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/2/2015