State v. Alvarado ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
    Docket No. 46250
    STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )
    )   Filed: March 19, 2019
    Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )
    )   Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk
    v.                                              )
    )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
    CORY L. ALVARADO,                               )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
    )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
    Defendant-Appellant.                     )
    )
    Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho,
    Washington County. Hon. Susan E. Wiebe, District Judge.
    Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of
    confinement of three years, for malicious injury to or destruction of a jail, affirmed.
    Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy
    Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
    Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
    General, Boise, for respondent.
    ________________________________________________
    Before HUSKEY, Judge; LORELLO, Judge;
    and BRAILSFORD, Judge
    ________________________________________________
    PER CURIAM
    Cory L. Alvarado pleaded guilty to felony malicious injury to or destruction of jail, 
    Idaho Code § 18-7018
    . The district court imposed a unified five-year sentence, with three years
    determinate. Alvarado appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.
    Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
    factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
    need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18, 
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-
    15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51, 
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App.
    1984); State v. Toohill, 
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568, 
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
    1
    the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726, 
    170 P.3d 387
    , 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
    in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
    Therefore, Alvarado’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 3/19/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/19/2019