-
Filed 5/7/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2018 ND 103
Interest of K.S.D., a child
Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
K.S.D., child; H.L.K., mother; Christopher D. Jones,
the Executive Director of the North Dakota
Department of Human Services, Respondents
and
R.W.D., father, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20170272
Interest of J.S.D., a child
Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
J.S.D., child; H.L.K., mother; Christopher D. Jones,
the Executive Director of the North Dakota
Department of Human Services, Respondents
and
R.W.D., father, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20170273
Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Jon J. Jensen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Megan J.K. Essig, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Interest of K.S.D.
No. 20170272
Interest of J.S.D.
No. 20170273
Per Curiam.
[¶1] R.W.D. appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to his two children. He argues insufficient evidence supports the termination of his parental rights. Retaining jurisdiction under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3), we remanded to the juvenile court for testimony of a qualified expert witness and findings about “the prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian child’s Tribe” under 25 U.S.C. § 1912(f) and 25 C.F.R. § 23.122(a). Interest of K.S.D. and J.S.D. , 2017 ND 289, ¶ 29, 904 N.W.2d 479. The juvenile court found the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt, through qualified expert testimony meeting the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act, that R.W.D.’s continued custody of the children likely would result in serious emotional or physical damage to the children. See 25 U.S.C. § 1912(f) and 25 C.F.R. § 23.122(a). We conclude that the juvenile court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and that the juvenile court complied with N.D.R.Civ.P. 63. We affirm the order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Stacy J. Louser, D.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Stacy J. Louser, D.J., sitting in place of Jensen, J., disqualified.
Document Info
Docket Number: 20170272
Citation Numbers: 2018 ND 103, 910 N.W.2d 834
Filed Date: 5/7/2018
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023