United States v. Tarl Brandon ( 2015 )

FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10281
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00494-KJD-
VCF-1
v. District of Nevada,
Las Vegas
TARL BRANDON,
Defendant - Appellant. ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10282
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00209-KJD-
VCF-1
v. District of Nevada,
Las Vegas
TARL BRANDON,
Defendant - Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10283
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00407-KJD-
GWF-1
v. District of Nevada,
Las Vegas
TARL BRANDON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Before: NOONAN, FERNANDEZ, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition filed on December 11, 2014 is amended as
follows:
At page 2, line 23, the following citation is added:
“Eslaminia v. White, 136 F.3d 1234, 1237 & n.1 (9th Cir. 1998)”
With this amendment, the panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing.
Judge Ikuta votes to deny petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Noonan and
Judge Fernandez recommend denying the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no
judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.
Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the petition for rehearing en banc
is DENIED.
No further petitions for rehearing and for rehearing en banc will be
entertained.
2