United States v. Alfred Havier, Jr. , 359 F. App'x 806 ( 2009 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 09 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10069
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:07-CR-00379-FRZ-
HCE-1
v.
ALFRED VINCENT HAVIER, Jr., MEMORANDUM *
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 2, 2009 **
San Francisco, California
Before: HUG, SKOPIL and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
Alfred Vincent Havier appeals from the district court’s sentence of 63
months imprisonment following his plea of guilty to charges of sexually abusing a
minor. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
court’s sentencing procedure for plain error. United States v. Autery, 555 F.3d
864, 868–70 (9th Cir. 2008). We review the reasonableness of the district court’s
sentence for abuse of discretion. Id. at 870–71.
The facts of this case are known to the parties. We do not repeat them.
“Whether sound discretion has been exercised must be answered in each
case through a thorough review of the record.” United States v. Barker, 771 F.2d
1362, 1366 (9th Cir. 1985). After reviewing the record in full, we determine that
the district court exercised sound discretion in this case. The district court did not
plainly err, nor did it abuse its discretion in declining to credit Havier with time
served in tribal custody.
AFFIRMED.