United States v. David Elmore , 586 F. App'x 310 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                              FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                DEC 02 2014
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No. 13-35316
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:05-cv-00810-JLR
    v.
    DAVID L. ELMORE,                                MEMORANDUM*
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Washington
    James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted November 21, 2014
    Portland, Oregon
    Before: CLIFTON, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
    David L. Elmore appeals a summary judgment in favor of the Internal Revenue
    Service (“IRS”) confirming tax assessments imposed for the tax years 1987 to 1993
    and ordering the sale of real property owned by Elmore to satisfy the judgment. We
    have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.
    1.    The IRS assessed unpaid taxes against Elmore under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6201-
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    6203, 6213, for three categories of taxable income. The IRS provided the “minimal
    factual foundation” needed for the “presumption of correctness” to attach to all the
    assessments. Palmer v. IRS, 
    116 F.3d 1309
    , 1312 (9th Cir. 1997). The burden then
    shifted to Elmore to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the IRS
    determinations were “arbitrary, excessive or without foundation.”          
    Id. (citing Helvering
    v. Taylor, 
    293 U.S. 507
    , 515-16 (1935)). He did not do so.
    a.     Rental income from 1987 to 1992. The IRS had obtained a quit-
    claim deed from Elmore’s wife to Elmore and a statement from the owner of record
    that Elmore was actually the one “improving the property.” An IRS revenue agent
    obtained a statement establishing that the tenants made regular payments to Elmore.
    This factual foundation was sufficient to give rise to a presumption of correctness for
    the assessment for unpaid rental income taxes. 
    Id. Elmore presented
    no evidence to rebut the presumption. Even assuming the
    tenant’s statement was hearsay, it was admissible to show Elmore “had not proved the
    Commissioner’s [deficiency assessment] determination to be arbitrary and
    capricious.” Avery v. Comm’r, 
    574 F.2d 467
    , 468 (9th Cir. 1978) (per curiam).
    b.     Self-employment income from 1987 to 1991 and 1993.
    Although the IRS no longer had the underlying third-party payor statements
    supporting its assessments for 1987 to 1989, various Forms 5278 (Statement – Income
    2
    Tax Changes) report the aggregate self-employment income the IRS alleges Elmore
    received for those years. This method of establishing self-employment income is
    sufficiently “rationally based” to “afford a presumption of correctness to the
    Commissioner’s determination.” 
    Palmer, 116 F.3d at 1312
    .
    The IRS’s inability to support its assessment for 1992 does not establish “a
    pattern of arbitrariness or carelessness” so as to “destroy” the presumption of
    correctness for the entire period. United States v. Stonehill, 
    702 F.2d 1288
    , 1294 (9th
    Cir. 1983). The existence of some evidence supporting the assessments distinguishes
    this case from the “naked” assessments in Weimerskirch v. Commissioner, 
    596 F.2d 358
    , 360, 362 (9th Cir. 1979).
    c.     Income from sale of real property in 1993. Because Elmore did
    not provide any evidence of his basis in the property, the assessment of the entire sale
    price as his income was proper. O’Neill v. Comm’r, 
    271 F.2d 44
    , 49-50 (9th Cir.
    1959).
    2.     The IRS concedes that the tax liens it originally sought to foreclose have
    been released by their express terms and pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6325. However, this
    suit also sought relief pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7403, under which the district court had
    the authority to reduce Elmore’s debt for unpaid taxes to judgment and order the sale
    of the real property at issue, regardless of the status of the underlying federal tax liens.
    3
    See United States v. Rodgers, 
    461 U.S. 677
    , 682 (1983).
    AFFIRMED.
    4