Prenatt v. G.W. Williams Co. , 437 F. App'x 543 ( 2011 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 08 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID PRENATT, No. 08-15009
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-06-01633-
GEB/DAD
v.
G.W. WILLIAMS CO., dba SIERRA MEMORANDUM *
ROBLES APTS.; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 24, 2011 **
Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
David Prenatt appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his constitutional rights were violated by
state court eviction proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Barren v. Harrington,
152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order).
We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order of dismissal
entered on December 3, 2007, which adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and
recommendations entered on November 6, 2007.
Prenatt’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
AFFIRMED.
2 08-15009