State v. Hulsey , 10 S.W.3d 154 ( 1999 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Joseph Hulsey appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault in. the second degree, for which he was sentenced to seven years imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender, and two counts of assault in the third degree, for which he was sentenced to concurrent one year jails terms on each count.¹

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1 . The trial court incorrectly entered a written judgment of conviction for assault in the second degree as to Count II; the jury verdict, however, found Defendant guilty of assault in the third degree and the trial court is directed to correct the written sentence under Rule 29.12.