-
ORDER
PER CURIAM. Movant, Daniel K. Oglesby, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find that the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Document Info
Docket Number: No. ED 84837
Citation Numbers: 168 S.W.3d 605
Judges: Cohen, Crane, Dowd
Filed Date: 5/24/2005
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/2/2021