Juana De Leon-Borayo v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 444 F. App'x 197 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            JUL 20 2011
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    JUANA DE LEON-BORAYO,                            No. 10-72723
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A027-211-797
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted July 12, 2011 **
    Before:        SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
    Juana De Leon-Borayo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for
    review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
    immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen deportation
    proceedings under section 203(c) of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    American Relief Act (“NACARA”). We have jurisdiction under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    .
    We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen,
    Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 
    272 F.3d 1176
    , 1187 (9th Cir. 2001), and we deny the
    petition for review.
    The agency did not abuse its discretion by denying De Leon-Borayo’s
    motion to reopen as untimely where the motion was filed after the September 11,
    1998, filing deadline, see 
    8 C.F.R. § 1003.43
    (e)(1), and De Leon-Borayo’s
    ignorance of the deadline and her status before the September 11, 1998, deadline
    was not caused by circumstances beyond her control, see Socop-Gonzalez, 
    272 F.3d at 1193
     (equitable tolling available in circumstances beyond a “garden variety
    claim of excusable neglect.”); cf. Albillo-De Leon v. Gonzales, 
    410 F.3d 1090
    ,
    1099 (9th Cir. 2005) (NACARA deadline tolled where petitioner missed deadline
    because of representative’s deception).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                  10-72723
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-72723

Citation Numbers: 444 F. App'x 197

Judges: Alarcon, Leavy, Schroeder

Filed Date: 7/20/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023