Willie Bailey, III v. J Wedell , 471 F. App'x 783 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                               MAR 15 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    WILLIE BAILEY, III,                                No. 10-17750
    Plaintiff - Appellant,              D.C. No. 2:04-cv-02067-GEB-
    EFB
    v.
    J. WEDELL; et al.,                                 MEMORANDUM *
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of California
    Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted March 6, 2012 **
    Before:        B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    Willie Bailey, III, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district
    court’s summary judgment in his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action alleging that defendants
    were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    . We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 
    391 F.3d 1051
    ,
    1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.
    The district court properly granted summary judgment because Bailey failed
    to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants Penner, Turella,
    or Howard were involved in or had any control over ordering, scheduling, or
    performing the relevant surgeries. See Taylor v. List, 
    880 F.2d 1040
    , 1045 (9th
    Cir. 1989) (no respondeat superior liability under § 1983; plaintiff must show
    personal involvement in alleged violations); Leer v. Murphy, 
    844 F.2d 628
    , 633
    (9th Cir. 1988) (“A person deprives another of a constitutional right, within the
    meaning of section 1983, if he does an affirmative act, participates in another’s
    affirmative acts, or omits to perform an act which he is legally required to do that
    causes the deprivation of which the plaintiff complains.” (alteration, citation, and
    internal quotation marks omitted)).
    Bailey’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    10-17750
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-17750

Citation Numbers: 471 F. App'x 783

Judges: Fletcher, Reinhardt, Tashima

Filed Date: 3/15/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023