Michael Williams v. Kerry Ruesch , 399 F. App'x 229 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            OCT 07 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    MICHAEL LEON WILLIAMS,                           No. 09-15322
    Plaintiff - Appellant,            D.C. No. 2:07-cv-01020-HDM-
    GWF
    v.
    KERRY RUESCH, Metro Police Officer;              MEMORANDUM *
    et al.,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Nevada
    Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted September 13, 2010 **
    Before:        SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N. R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    Michael Leon Williams, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
    district court’s order denying him leave to amend the complaint in his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action alleging that a police officer presented perjured testimony to a grand
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    09-15322
    jury, causing Williams’s indictment on criminal charges that were later dismissed.
    We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    . We review for an abuse of
    discretion the denial of leave to amend. Halet v. Wend Inv. Co., 
    672 F.2d 1305
    ,
    1310 (9th Cir. 1982). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Zuress
    v. Donley, 
    606 F.3d 1249
    , 1252 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.
    The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Williams leave to
    amend his complaint because amendment would have been futile. The defendant
    police officer is entitled to absolute immunity because he did not function as the
    complaining witness in the criminal case against Williams. See McSherry v. City
    of Long Beach, 
    584 F.3d 1129
    , 1147 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (police officer defendant
    absolutely immune from § 1983 liability for allegedly perjured testimony where
    the complaining witness in the underlying criminal case was the victim). The
    deputy district attorneys whom Williams sought to name in his Second Amended
    Complaint also enjoyed absolute immunity. See Imbler v. Pachtman, 
    424 U.S. 409
    , 410 (1976) (prosecutor absolutely immune from § 1983 liability in action
    alleging he knowingly used false testimony at trial).
    Williams’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    09-15322
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-15322

Citation Numbers: 399 F. App'x 229

Judges: Callahan, Silverman, Smith

Filed Date: 10/7/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023