State v. Clendenin , 273 P.3d 430 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                           IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS
    ‐‐‐‐ooOoo‐‐‐‐
    State of Utah,                                )           PER CURIAM DECISION
    )
    Plaintiff and Appellee,                )            Case No. 20111100‐CA
    )
    v.                                            )                  FILED
    )                (March 1, 2012)
    Gregory Floyd Clendenin,                      )
    )                
    2012 UT App 64
    Defendant and Appellant.               )
    ‐‐‐‐‐
    Fourth District, Fillmore Department, 111700134
    The Honorable James M. Brady
    Attorneys:       Tate W. Bennett, Fillmore, for Appellant
    Mark L. Shurtleff and Marian Decker, Salt Lake City, for Appellee
    ‐‐‐‐‐
    Before Judges Davis, Thorne, and Christiansen.
    ¶1      Gregory Floyd Clendenin seeks to appeal his conviction of possession of a
    weapon in a correctional facility. This matter is before the court on its own motion for
    summary disposition on the basis that this court lacks jurisdiction because there is no
    final, appealable order.
    ¶2      This court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal unless it is taken from
    a final judgment or order or qualifies for an exception to the final judgment rule. See
    Loffredo v. Holt, 
    2001 UT 97
    , ¶¶ 10, 15, 
    37 P.3d 1070
    . An order is final only if it disposes
    of the case as to all parties and “finally dispose[s] of the subject‐matter of the litigation
    on the merits of the case.” Bradbury v. Valencia, 
    2000 UT 50
    , ¶ 9, 
    5 P.3d 649
     (citation and
    internal quotation marks omitted). “In a criminal case, it is ‘the sentence itself which
    constitutes a final judgment from which the appellant has the right to appeal.’” State v.
    Bowers, 
    2002 UT 100
    , ¶ 4, 
    57 P.3d 1065
     (quoting State v. Gerrard, 
    584 P.2d 885
    , 886 (Utah
    1978)).
    ¶3      Clendenin was convicted by a jury of possession of a weapon in a correctional
    facility on November 16, 2011. However, Clendenin has not yet been sentenced.
    Accordingly, there is no final, appealable order, and we lack jurisdiction over the
    appeal. See 
    id.
     When this court lacks jurisdiction, it must dismiss the appeal. See
    Loffredo, 
    2001 UT 97
    , ¶ 11.
    ¶4     The appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a timely appeal after
    the district court enters a final, appealable order.
    ____________________________________
    James Z. Davis, Judge
    ____________________________________
    William A. Thorne Jr., Judge
    ____________________________________
    Michele M. Christiansen, Judge
    20111100‐CA                                 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20111100-CA

Citation Numbers: 2012 UT App 64, 273 P.3d 430

Filed Date: 3/1/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023