United States v. Marco Chavez , 503 F. App'x 494 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                       FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                     DEC 19 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                               U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                    No. 11-50258
    Plaintiff - Appellee,                          D.C. No. 8:10-CR-00033-AG-1
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    MARCO ANTONIO CHAVEZ, etc.
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted November 8, 2012
    Pasadena, California
    Before:        REINHARDT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and NAVARRO,**
    District Judge.
    Marco Antonio Chavez appeals the sentence imposed by the district court
    following Chavez’s guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute
    approximately 493.3 grams of pure methamphetamine in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 846
     and 841(b)(1)(A). The district court sentenced Chavez to eighty-seven
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as
    provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The Honorable Gloria M. Navarro, United States District Judge for the District of
    Nevada, sitting by designation.
    months, to be followed by a five-year term of supervised release. This sentence
    included a two-level enhancement for possession of a dangerous weapon during
    the commission of the offense.
    We review the district court’s sentencing decision for abuse of discretion.
    United States v. Armstead, 
    552 F.3d 769
    , 776 (9th Cir. 2008). We review the
    district court’s underlying factual findings for clear error. 
    Id.
     Based on the parties’
    arguments and the Court’s examination of the record, we conclude that Chavez
    should have reasonably foreseen that his co-conspirators would possess a firearm
    during the execution of such a major drug transaction. United States v. Garcia, 
    909 F.2d 1346
    , 1350 (9th Cir. 1990). Therefore, the district court did not clearly err in
    determining that the two-level sentencing enhancement for possession of a
    dangerous weapon was appropriate. 
    Id.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-50258

Citation Numbers: 503 F. App'x 494

Judges: Navarro, Reinhardt, Thomas

Filed Date: 12/19/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023