United States v. James Bell , 436 F. App'x 771 ( 2011 )

MEMORANDUM **

James Dalton Bell contends that the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release violated his rights to due process and a jury trial. We dismiss.

We will not review the merits of Bell’s contentions because the “interlocutory notice of appeal” (“NOA”) does not mention the sentence, which was imposed six days after the NOA was filed, and no subsequent NOA was ever filed. See Fed. RApp. P. 3(c)(1)(B); 4(b)(1)(A) and (b)(2).

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.