United States v. Joseph Turner , 468 F. App'x 788 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             FEB 22 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 11-50145
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:00-cr-00904-GHK
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    JOSEPH TURNER, a.k.a. Michael W.
    Daniels, a.k.a. Joseph J. Turner, a.k.a.
    Michael J. Turner,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    George H. King, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted February 21, 2012 **
    Before:        FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    Federal prisoner Joseph Turner appeals pro se the district court’s order
    denying his motion to modify his term of imprisonment following jury-trial
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. Appellant. P. 34(a)(2).
    convictions on, inter alia, two counts of using or carrying a firearm during a crime
    of violence, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (c). We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and we affirm.
    Turner contends that the district court erred in imposing a mandatory 25-
    year minimum sentence for a second conviction under 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (c), where
    the second offense was charged in the same indictment as the first offense. The
    district court did not err in determining that this claim is not cognizable under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c). See United States v. Lightfoot, 
    626 F.3d 1092
    , 1096 (9th Cir.
    2010) (section 3582(c)(2) permits modification only where sentencing range
    applicable to defendant has subsequently been lowered). In any event, this
    argument is without merit. See United States v. Beltran-Moreno, 
    556 F.3d 913
    ,
    915 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[W]hen the government charges more than one § 924(c)
    offense in a single indictment, each additional count is to be treated as a ‘second or
    subsequent conviction’ for purposes of 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (c)(1)(C)(i) and therefore
    carries a mandatory minimum sentence of twenty-five years.”)
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    11-50145
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-50145

Citation Numbers: 468 F. App'x 788

Judges: Bybee, Fernandez, McKEOWN

Filed Date: 2/22/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023