Alma Adelina Gutierrez Valle v. Eric H. Holder Jr. , 361 F. App'x 891 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                          JAN 11 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                     U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    ALMA ADELINA GUTIERREZ VALLE;                     No. 08-74149
    et al.,
    Agency Nos. A099-070-804
    Petitioners,                                  A099-070-805
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    **
    Submitted December 15, 2009
    Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    Alma Adelina Gutierrez Valle and her daughter Kelly A. Carrillo Gutierrez,
    natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the decision of the
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    jlf/Inventory
    Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial
    of petitioners’ application for cancellation of removal.
    We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that
    Gutierrez Valle failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her
    United States citizen son. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 
    424 F.3d 926
    , 930 (9th
    Cir. 2005). We also lack jurisdiction to review Gutierrez Valle’s claim that
    conditions have changed in Mexico due to increased drug violence and swine flu
    health concerns because petitioner failed to exhaust the issue before the agency.
    See Barron v. Ashcroft, 
    358 F.3d 674
    , 678 (9th Cir. 2004). Gutierrez Valle’s
    contention that her removal would violate the due process rights of her United
    States citizen son by resulting in the de facto removal of her son is foreclosed. See
    Urbano de Malaluan v. INS, 
    577 F.2d 589
    , 594 (9th Cir. 1978). Finally, we
    uphold the agency’s determination that Carrillo Gutierrez lacked a qualifying
    relative, and was statutorily ineligible for cancellation relief. See 8 U.S.C. §
    1229b(b)(1).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED IN PART; DENIED IN PART.
    jlf/Inventory                               2                                      08-74149
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-74149

Citation Numbers: 361 F. App'x 891

Filed Date: 1/11/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023