In re Auster , 278 A.D. 784 ( 1951 )

In a proceeding by way of writ of habeas corpus to determine custody of the infant son of the parties, Rose Auster (formerly Rose Weberman) appeals from so much of two orders dated respectively October 9, 1950, and December 4,1950, as continued custody of the infant in the respondent. Orders, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [198 Mise. 1055.] [See ante, p. 656.]