Westley v. Kurtz , 35 F. App'x 839 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                                                                           F I L E D
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    MAY 24 2002
    TENTH CIRCUIT
    PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk
    RICHARD ALLEN WESTLEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    No. 02-1051
    (D.C. No. 01-Z-2418)
    ROBERT KURTZ, Warden, and THE
    (D. Colorado)
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
    STATE OF COLORADO,
    Respondents - Appellees.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before TACHA, Chief Judge, EBEL and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.
    Petitioner-Appellant Richard Allen Westley appeals from the denial of his
    petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He claims that the
    Colorado state courts erred in determining that he had not established excusable
    neglect for the untimely filing of his motion for post-conviction relief in state
    *
    After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has
    determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the
    determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R.
    34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This
    Order and Judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of
    the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
    citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be
    cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    court. The excusable neglect arises, according to Westley, from his lack of access
    to an adequate law library during his incarceration. This claim is not the proper
    subject of habeas review. As the district court properly recognized, an alleged
    error that “focuses only on the State’s post-conviction remedy and not the
    judgment which provides the basis for his incarceration . . . states no cognizable
    federal habeas claim.” Sellers v. Ward, 
    135 F.3d 1333
    , 1339 (10th Cir. 1998).
    Westley’s motion for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. This appeal
    is DISMISSED. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is also
    DENIED.
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT
    David M. Ebel
    Circuit Judge
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-1051

Citation Numbers: 35 F. App'x 839

Judges: Ebel, Lucero, Tacha

Filed Date: 5/24/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023