Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Usepa ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        JUL 18 2022
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; No. 20-73146
    CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY,
    EPA No.
    Petitioners,          EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0038-0040
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    AGENCY,
    Respondent,
    ______________________________
    VALENT U.S.A. LLC,
    Intervenor.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Environmental Protection Agency
    Argued and Submitted July 7, 2022
    Portland, Oregon
    Before: R. NELSON and LEE, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,** District Judge.
    Petitioners Center for Biological Diversity (“CBD”) and Center for Food
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the
    Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    Safety challenge an order by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)
    registering a new fungicide called inpyrfluxam.1 We have jurisdiction under 7
    U.S.C. § 136n(b) and grant the petition in part, and remand to the EPA with
    instructions.
    Petitioners challenge the registration on various grounds, including EPA’s
    failure to make an effects determination under § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species
    Act and to consult with federal wildlife agencies. At oral argument, Petitioners
    withdrew their request that the court vacate the registration and asked us to impose
    on EPA a deadline to complete its effects determination and initiate consultation as
    necessary. Intervenor Valent does not object to remand without vacatur or with a
    deadline. EPA admits error and asks for a voluntary remand, without vacatur or a
    deadline. EPA has represented to the court that it is on track to have a draft effects
    determination by fall 2022 and a final effects determination by spring 2023.
    We grant EPA’s request for a voluntary remand. We remand to EPA with a
    deadline to complete its final effects determination for inpyrfluxam and
    inpyrfluxam products and to initiate any required consultation with the wildlife
    agencies by June 22, 2023.
    The parties will bear their own costs.
    1
    CBD has associational standing, sufficient for the appeal to proceed. See Nat’l
    Fam. Farm Coal. v. EPA, 
    966 F.3d 893
    , 908 (9th Cir. 2020).
    2
    GRANTED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-73146

Filed Date: 7/18/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/18/2022