Fox v. New York City Interborough Railway Co. , 98 N.Y.S. 341 ( 1906 )

Clarke, J. :

This was an appeal from an order denying a motion for a reargument of the' motion for the continuance of an injunction pendente lite herein. As upon appeal the original order continuing -the in j unction has been reversed by_ the order of this court, handed down with an opinion this day {ante, p. 832), it is only necessary to affirm the order herein appealed- from, without costs. Ingraham,-. McLaughlin, Laughlin and Houghton, JJ., concurred. Order affirmed, without Costs. Order filed.