United States v. Robert Folsom ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         JUL 20 2022
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No.   21-10256
    Plaintiff-Appellee,              D.C. No.
    2:17-cr-00176-JAD-VCF-1
    v.
    ROBERT FOLSOM,                                   MEMORANDUM*
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Nevada
    Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted July 12, 2022**
    Before:      SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
    Robert Folsom appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
    guilty-plea conviction and 12-month-and-1-day sentence for possession with intent
    to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1),
    (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), Folsom’s
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a
    motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Folsom has filed a pro se supplemental
    brief. No answering brief has been filed.
    Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to Folsom’s conviction. The record
    does not support Folsom’s pro se contention that his plea was not knowing and
    voluntary, or his other challenges to the validity of his conviction, and we do not
    reach on direct appeal his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United
    States v. Rahman, 
    642 F.3d 1257
    , 1259-60 (9th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, we
    affirm Folsom’s conviction.
    Folsom waived his right to appeal his sentence. Because the record
    discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver, see Penson, 
    488 U.S. at 80
    , we dismiss Folsom’s appeal of his sentence. See United States v. Watson, 
    582 F.3d 974
    , 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
    2                                   21-10256
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-10256

Filed Date: 7/20/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/20/2022