Adams v. Gonzales , 236 F. App'x 977 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                                                           United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FIFTH CIRCUIT                        June 25, 2007
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 05-60874
    Summary Calendar
    MOSES APPOH ADAMS,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    ALBERTO R. GONZALES,
    U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    Respondent.
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    (A78 551 607)
    Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Moses Appoh Adams, a citizen of Ghana, challenges the Board of
    Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen.              The
    Government contends Adams’ petition for review is timely only as to
    the denial of his motion to reconsider, while his brief challenges
    only the denial of his motion to reopen.      We agree.
    Because Adams’ petition for review was not filed within 30
    days of the denial of the motion to reopen, it is dismissed as to
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    that denial.   See 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    (b)(1); Karimian-Kaklaki v. INS,
    
    997 F.2d 108
    , 111 (5th Cir. 1993).   Adams’ petition is timely as to
    the BIA’s denial of his motion to reconsider.      Adams has waived
    review of that denial, however, by failing to challenge it in his
    brief. See Rodriguez v. INS, 
    9 F.3d 408
    , 414 n.15 (5th Cir. 1993);
    Calderon-Ontiveros v. INS, 
    809 F.2d 1050
    , 1052 (5th Cir. 1986).
    Therefore, his petition is denied as to the BIA’s denial of his
    motion to reconsider.
    PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-60874

Citation Numbers: 236 F. App'x 977

Judges: Barksdale, Benavides, Davis, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 6/25/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023