Van Winkle v. Ketcham , 3 Cai. Cas. 323 ( 1805 )

THE court decided in this cause,hhat the promissory note of an infant, carrying on trade as an adult, could not be enforced against him by the payee, who had taken it . . r i . , ' , . , - r m the course or business,- without knowing tne d ant’s nonage.