Ronald Oertwich v. Traditional Village of Togiak ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                   FOR PUBLICATION
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    RONALD OERTWICH,                      No. 19-36029
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    D.C.
    v.                 No. 3:19-cv-00082-JWS
    TRADITIONAL VILLAGE OF
    TOGIAK, AKA Community of                ORDER
    Togiak, AKA Native Village
    of Togiak, AKA Traditional
    Council of Togiak; JIMMY
    COOPCHIAK; LEROY
    NANALOOK; ANECIA KRITZ;
    ESTHER THOMPSON; JOHN
    NICK; WILLIE WASSILLIE;
    HERBERT JR. LOCKUK;
    WILLIE ECHUCK, JR.; CRAIG
    LOGUSAK, in their individual
    and official capacities; PAUL
    MARKOFF; PETER LOCKUK,
    SR.; BOBBY COOPCHIAK,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Alaska
    John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding
    2     OERTWICH V. TRADITIONAL VILLAGE OF TOGIAK
    Argued and Submitted June 15, 2021
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Filed July 28, 2022
    Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Morgan Christen, and
    Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges.
    Order
    COUNSEL
    David H. Tennant (argued), Law Office of David Tennant
    PLLC, Rochester, New York; Andy L. Pevehouse, Kenai
    Law Group LLC, Kenai, Alaska; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Whitney A. Leonard (argued), Rebecca A. Patterson, Richard
    D. Monkman, and Nathaniel Amdur-Clark, Sonosky
    Chambers Sachse Miller Monkman LLP, Anchorage, Alaska,
    for Defendants-Appellees.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the Notification of Death of Appellant
    (Docket Entry No. 74), this court entered an order requiring
    the filing of a motion to substitute a personal representative
    for the decedent within thirty (30) days (Docket Entry
    No. 75). At the request of Appellant’s counsel, we entered an
    order granting an extension (Docket No. 78) to no later than
    July 11, 2022. To date, no request to substitute a personal
    representative has been filed.             Accordingly, we
    WITHDRAW the Opinion filed March 30, 2022, Oertwich
    OERTWICH V. TRADITIONAL VILLAGE OF TOGIAK           3
    v. Traditional Village of Togiak, 
    29 F.4th 1108
     (9th Cir.
    2022), and DISMISS this appeal. This Order shall constitute
    the mandate in this case.
    The Petition for Panel Rehearing (Docket No. 71) is
    DENIED as moot.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-36029

Filed Date: 7/28/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/28/2022