United States v. David Jensen , 671 F. App'x 694 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      DEC 21 2016
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No. 16-30024
    Plaintiff-Appellee,            D.C. No. 9:15-cr-00015-DLC
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    DAVID LAWRENCE JENSEN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Montana
    Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge, Presiding
    Submitted December 14, 2016**
    Before:       WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    David Lawrence Jensen appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges the 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
    being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    §§ 922(g)(1), and 924(a)(2), (d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
    and we affirm.
    Jensen contends that the district court erred by imposing a four-level
    enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) for possession of a firearm in
    connection with a burglary. We review for clear error, see United States v.
    Newhoff, 
    627 F.3d 1163
    , 1170 (9th Cir. 2010), and hold there is none. The record
    reflects that a stolen gun was found in Jensen’s residence, a credit card was stolen
    from the theft victim in the same incident, and an individual driving a car that fit
    the description of Jensen’s car used the stolen credit card on the day on which the
    victim reported the theft. The district court did not clearly err in holding that this
    evidence was sufficient, by a preponderance of the evidence, to establish that
    Jensen took a firearm during the course of a burglary. See 
    id. (district court’s
    inference that defendant stole a firearm was reasonable based on circumstantial
    evidence, which “can prove a sentencing fact”).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     16-30024
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-30024

Citation Numbers: 671 F. App'x 694

Filed Date: 12/21/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023