Herrera-Torres v. Holder , 381 F. App'x 685 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            JUN 02 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    RICARDO HERRERA-TORRES;                          No. 07-74394
    JANETH JAQUELINE HERRERA,
    Agency Nos. A075-712-591
    Petitioners,                                  A070-039-485
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted May 25, 2010 **
    Before:        CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    Ricardo Herrera-Torres, a native and citizen of Mexico, and Janeth Jaqueline
    Herrera, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of
    Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
    substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Urzua Covarrubias v. Gonzales,
    
    487 F.3d 742
    , 747 (9th Cir. 2007), and review de novo questions of law,
    Altamirano v. Gonzales, 
    427 F.3d 586
    , 591 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition
    for review.
    Accepting arguendo petitioners’ testimony as true, substantial evidence
    nonetheless supports the agency’s determination that petitioners knowingly
    encouraged and assisted another alien to try to enter the United States in violation
    of law. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i); Urzua 
    Covarrubias, 487 F.3d at 748-49
    (substantial evidence supported determination that alien aided and abetted another
    alien’s illegal entry into the United States). Petitioners fail to present any authority
    suggesting that the affirmative defense of abandonment of an attempt, as employed
    in criminal law, is applicable to a charge under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                    07-74394
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-74394

Citation Numbers: 381 F. App'x 685

Judges: Canby, Fletcher, Thomas

Filed Date: 6/2/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023