Shirley Remmert v. United States , 670 F. App'x 584 ( 2016 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SHIRLEY VENOYA REMMERT, No. 15-16471
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:15-mc-80178-VC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Vince G. Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2016**
Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Shirley Venoya Remmert appeals pro se from the district court’s order
denying her leave to file a complaint under a vexatious litigant order. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the
application of a vexatious litigant order. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(9th Cir. 1990). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Remmert leave to
file a complaint against defendants because Remmert attempted to file the
complaint in violation of a vexatious litigant ordered entered against her. See id.AFFIRMED.
2 15-16471