United States v. Zollie Byrd , 407 F. App'x 260 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JAN 05 2011
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 10-30087
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 6:09-cr-00022-CCL
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ZOLLIE LOUIS BYRD,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Montana
    Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted December 14, 2010 **
    Before:        GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    Zollie Louis Byrd appeals from the 68-month sentence imposed following
    his guilty plea conviction for possession of an unregistered machine gun, in
    violation of 
    26 U.S.C. §§ 5841
    , 5861(d) and 5871. We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and we affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Byrd contends that the district court erred in using his prior firearms
    conviction as a basis for imposing a 3-level sentencing enhancement under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3147
    , and in calculating his criminal history score. This contention is
    foreclosed by United States v. Tavakkoly, 
    238 F.3d 1062
    , 1068 (9th Cir. 2001).
    See also Garcia-Cardenas, 
    555 F.3d 1049
    , 1050 (9th Cir. 2009) (“We previously
    have rejected [defendant’s] claim that the use of a prior conviction as a basis for a
    sentencing enhancement and for calculating a defendant’s criminal history score
    constitutes impermissible double counting.”).
    Byrd also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because it
    is longer than necessary in light of his background and the circumstances
    surrounding his offense. The record reflects that Byrd’s guideline sentence is
    substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances. See Gall v.
    United States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    , 51-52 (2007).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    10-30087
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-30087

Citation Numbers: 407 F. App'x 260

Judges: Clifton, Goodwin, Wallace

Filed Date: 1/5/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023