United States v. Erik Altamirano , 615 F. App'x 875 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             SEP 02 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 15-50090
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:14-cr-03059-BEN
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    ERIK ALTAMIRANO,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted August 25, 2015**
    Before:        McKEOWN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
    Erik Altamirano appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
    the 18-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
    importation of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960. We have jurisdiction
    under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Altamirano contends that the district court applied the wrong legal standard
    and considered improper factors when determining whether he was entitled to a
    minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). We review the district court’s
    interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. See United States v. Hurtado,
    
    760 F.3d 1065
    , 1068 (9th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 
    135 S. Ct. 1467
    (2015). The
    district court considered the parties’ arguments and concluded that the record did
    not support a finding that Altamirano was entitled to a minor role adjustment. The
    court’s rejection of the adjustment was consistent with the guideline and our
    precedent. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A) (adjustment available only if
    defendant is “substantially less culpable than the average participant”); United
    States v. Rosas, 
    615 F.3d 1058
    , 1067 (9th Cir. 2010) (defendant’s burden to
    establish his entitlement to the adjustment). Finally, the district court was not
    required to consider Altamirano’s lack of knowledge of the smuggling enterprise
    when determining whether Altamirano played a minor role in the offense. See
    U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.4 (lack of knowledge relevant to minimal participant
    adjustment).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    15-50090
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-50090

Citation Numbers: 615 F. App'x 875

Filed Date: 9/2/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023