Paul Guidry v. Marine Engineers' Beneficial , 616 F. App'x 352 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FILED
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    SEP 29 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    PAUL L. GUIDRY,                                  No. 13-15597
    Plaintiff - Appellant,             D.C. No. 3:11-cv-05347-CRB
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    MARINE ENGINEERS’ BENEFICIAL
    ASSOCIATION,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of California
    Charles R. Breyer, Senior District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted September 15, 2015
    San Francisco, California
    Before: W. FLETCHER, BERZON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    Paul Guidry appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the
    Marine Engineers’ Beneficial Association (“MEBA”). We review the grant of
    summary judgment de novo, and we affirm. McGinest v. GTE Serv. Corp., 
    360 F.3d 1103
    , 1112 (9th Cir. 2004).
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    Guidry submitted no evidence that MEBA was complicit in the delay of
    Guidry’s Brazilian work visa or that MEBA took part in any alleged discrimination
    on the part of Guidry’s prospective employer, OSG Ship Management, Inc.
    (“OSG”). Nor did Guidry submit any legal authority or evidence that makes
    MEBA vicariously liable for any alleged discrimination perpetrated by OSG or the
    Brazilian government. Therefore, there is no issue of triable fact as to Guidry’s
    Title VII claim against MEBA.
    To make out a claim that MEBA breached its duty of fair representation to
    Guidry, Guidry must submit evidence that MEBA’s “conduct toward [him] . . .
    [wa]s arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith. Conduct can be classified as
    arbitrary only when it is irrational, when it is without a rational basis or
    explanation.” Beck v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 99, 
    506 F.3d 874
    , 879 (9th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
    Dave Nolan, a MEBA employee, investigated Guidry’s grievance. Guidry
    submitted no evidence that after Nolan investigated, and found evidence that
    Guidry’s passport had been delayed for reasons untraceable to OSG, Nolan’s
    decision to end the investigation was arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith.
    Therefore, in the absence of any evidence that gives rise to a genuine issue of fact,
    summary judgment was properly granted to MEBA.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-15597

Citation Numbers: 616 F. App'x 352

Filed Date: 9/29/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023