-
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30217 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00214-JLR-1 v. PRADYUMNA KUMAR SAMAL, MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 2, 2020** Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Pradyumna Kumar Samal appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 87–month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for mail fraud, in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 1341, and failure to pay or collect taxes, in * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violation of
26 U.S.C. § 7202. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss. Samal contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing when counsel failed to object to probation’s criminal history calculation. We agree with the government that Samal’s claim is barred by the appeal waiver in the parties’ plea agreement in which Samal gave up his right to pursue a direct appeal of his sentence. See United States v. Nunez,
223 F.3d 956, 959 (9th Cir. 2000) (“[O]ne waives the right to argue ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing on direct appeal when one waives the right to appeal the sentence.”). As the language of the appeal waiver contemplates, any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel may be raised in a
28 U.S.C. § 2255motion. See United States v. McKenna,
327 F.3d 830, 845 (9th Cir. 2003). DISMISSED. 2 19-30217
Document Info
Docket Number: 19-30217
Filed Date: 6/11/2020
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 6/11/2020