Alber Said v. Cir ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             FILED
    FEB 22 2021
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    ALBER I. SAID; GEORGETTE H. SAID,                 No. 20-70223
    Petitioners-Appellants,          Tax Ct. No. 18597-19
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
    REVENUE,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    Appeal from a Decision of the
    United States Tax Court
    Submitted February 17, 2021**
    Before:      FERNANDEZ, BYBEE and BADE, Circuit Judges.
    Alber I. Said and Georgette H. Said appeal pro se from the Tax Court’s
    order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction their petition regarding their tax liabilities
    for the 1993 to 1995 tax years. We have jurisdiction under 
    26 U.S.C. § 7482
    (a)(1).
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    We review de novo. Gorospe v. Comm’r, 
    451 F.3d 966
    , 968 (9th Cir. 2006). We
    affirm.
    The Tax Court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the Saids’
    petition because the Saids did not file it within 90 days of a notice of deficiency or
    30 days of a notice of determination. See 
    26 U.S.C. §§ 6213
    (a) (establishing a 90-
    day requirement for appealing a notice of deficiency); 6320(c) & 6330(d)(1)
    (establishing a 30-day requirement for appealing a notice of determination
    concerning notices of lien or notices of intent to levy); Gorospe, 
    451 F.3d at 968
    (the Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and its subject matter is defined by
    Title 26 of the United States Code).
    We reject as meritless the Saids’ contentions that the Tax Court’s final
    decisions sustaining the deficiency for 1993 to 1995 were reached by fraud or
    mutual mistake, and that Tax Court Rules 314 and 341 create jurisdiction for their
    petition.
    We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued
    in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
    appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 
    587 F.3d 983
    , 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
    All pending motions and requests are denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                      20-70223
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-70223

Filed Date: 2/22/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/22/2021