Joseph Lombardi v. Directv, Inc. , 546 F. App'x 715 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                                           FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             DEC 02 2013
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    JOSEPH LOMBARDI,                                 No. 11-56752
    Plaintiff-counter-defendant,       D.C. No. 8:09-ml-02093-AG-AN
    and
    MEMORANDUM*
    ANNETTE KAHALY; JOHN MULEA;
    MAUREEN VAN METER; CAROLYN
    FORBES; TARA MURRAY; SEAN
    MURRAY; KEITH HARPER; JANA
    HARPER; TRACY TWYMAN; EBEN
    PAGUIRIGAN, individually and on behalf
    of all others similarly situated; LOUIS M.
    WILSON; KAREN BRICE,
    Plaintiffs-counter-defendants
    - Appellees,
    v.
    DIRECTV, INC.,
    Defendant-counter-claimant -
    Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    Argued and Submitted November 5, 2013
    Pasadena, California
    Before: GOODWIN, FISHER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    DirecTV appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to compel
    arbitration of the plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive relief under California’s Unfair
    Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). We have
    jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(B), and we reverse.
    This court recently held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts
    California’s Broughton-Cruz rule, on which the district court based its denial. See
    Ferguson v. Corinthian Colls., Inc., — F.3d —, No. 11-56965, 
    2013 WL 5779514
    ,
    at *1 (9th Cir. Oct. 28, 2013). The plaintiffs’ arguments for affirming the district
    court on alternative grounds fail. The “effective vindication” exception to the FAA
    does not extend to state statutes, including the UCL and the CLRA. See 
    id. at *6.
    That customers have to arbitrate their claims for injunctive relief against DirecTV
    whereas DirecTV is unlikely to seek injunctive relief from its customers does not
    make the arbitration agreement unconscionable. Cf. Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v.
    Moreno, 
    163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 269
    , 285, 303-04 (2013).
    REVERSED AND REMANDED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-56752

Citation Numbers: 546 F. App'x 715

Judges: Clifton, Fisher, Goodwin

Filed Date: 12/2/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2023