United States v. Michael Kapp , 552 F. App'x 773 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            JAN 23 2014
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                     U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 12-10626
    Plaintiff - Appellee,            D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00739-FJM
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    MICHAEL RAY KAPP, a.k.a. Michael
    Kapp,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Arizona
    James G. Carr, District Judge, Presiding**
    Submitted January 21, 2014***
    Before:         CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    Michael Ray Kapp appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
    his guilty-plea conviction and 210-month sentence for possession with intent to
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The Honorable James G. Carr, Senior United States District Judge for
    the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
    ***
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
    § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii); and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug
    trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). Pursuant to Anders
    v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), Kapp’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
    there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
    record. We have provided Kapp the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
    No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
    Kapp has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our
    independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80
    (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
    States v. Watson, 
    582 F.3d 974
    , 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss
    the appeal. See 
    id. at 988.
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    Kapp’s pro se motion to seal this appeal is DENIED. The motion, the
    Anders brief, and the excerpts of record shall remain under seal.
    DISMISSED.
    2                                    12-10626
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-10626

Citation Numbers: 552 F. App'x 773

Judges: Canby, Paez, Silverman

Filed Date: 1/23/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2023