United States v. Lucky Mapuni , 530 F. App'x 651 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JUN 21 2013
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 12-10357
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00923-LEK
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    LUCKY DIAMOND MAPUNI,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Hawaii
    Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted June 18, 2013**
    Before:        TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
    Lucky Diamond Mapuni appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 180-month sentence for conspiracy to
    distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of
    methamphetamine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
    (a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), Mapuni’s counsel has filed
    a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
    as counsel of record. Mapuni has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering
    brief has been filed.
    Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Mapuni’s conviction.
    We accordingly affirm Mapuni’s conviction.
    Mapuni waived his right to appeal his sentence. Our independent review of
    the record discloses no arguable issues as to the validity of the waiver. See United
    States v. Watson, 
    582 F.3d 974
    , 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). Moreover, we reject
    Mapuni’s contention that the district court invalidated the appeal waiver during
    sentencing. See United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 
    156 F.3d 974
    , 977 (9th Cir 1998).
    We therefore dismiss Mapuni’s appeal as to his sentence. See Watson, 
    582 F.3d at 988
    .
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
    2                                    12-10357
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-10357

Citation Numbers: 530 F. App'x 651

Filed Date: 6/21/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021