Larry Cortinas v. S. Gates ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       APR 19 2022
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS,                         No. 21-15018
    Plaintiff-Appellant,            D.C. No. 1:19-cv-01709-DAD-SKO
    v.
    S. GATES; CONALL MCCABE; DAVE
    DAVEY, Warden; R. GILL; J. LEWIS; C.            MEMORANDUM*
    SMITH; S. RAMIREZ; R. PHAM; CELIA
    BELL; ROBIN MCCONNELL; EDGAR
    CLARK; CARMEN FISCHER, Esquire,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of California
    Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted April 11, 2022**
    Before:      McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
    California state prisoner Larry William Cortinas appeals pro se from the
    district court’s judgment dismissing his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action alleging deliberate
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    . We review de novo a district court’s dismissal of a complaint for failure to
    state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Hayes v. Idaho Corr. Ctr., 
    849 F.3d 1204
    ,
    1208 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.
    The district court properly dismissed Cortinas’s action because Cortinas
    failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Hebbe v. Pliler, 
    627 F.3d 338
    , 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are construed liberally,
    plaintiff must present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for
    relief); Toguchi v. Chung, 
    391 F.3d 1051
    , 1056-60 (9th Cir. 2004) (a prison official
    is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive
    risk to inmate health; medical malpractice, negligence, or a difference of opinion
    concerning the course of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference).
    Cortinas’s motions to appoint counsel are denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     21-15018
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-15018

Filed Date: 4/19/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/19/2022