United States v. Manuel Landeros-Lopez ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                              NOT FOR PUBLICATION                          FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      AUG 22 2023
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No.   22-50279
    Plaintiff-Appellee,            D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00609-MWF-2
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    MANUEL ANGEL LANDEROS-LOPEZ,
    AKA Manuel Lopez, AKA Manuel Lopez-
    Landeros, AKA Unidentified Male 1,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted August 15, 2023**
    Before:        TASHIMA, S.R. THOMAS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
    Manuel Angel Landeros-Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment
    and challenges the 135-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea
    conviction for conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    OSA129
    cocaine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
    (a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(ii), and 846. Pursuant to
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), Landeros-Lopez’s counsel has filed a
    brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
    as counsel of record. We have provided Landeros-Lopez the opportunity to file a
    pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has
    been filed.
    The sentence imposed by the district court triggered the appeal waiver,
    which bars Landeros-Lopez from challenging his custodial sentence, his
    supervised release term, and the conditions of his supervised release. Our
    independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80
    (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
    States v. Watson, 
    582 F.3d 974
    , 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We therefore dismiss
    Landeros-Lopez’s appeal.
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    DISMISSED.
    2                                   22-50279
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-50279

Filed Date: 8/22/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/22/2023