Pash v. Halko , 185 So. 3d 713 ( 2016 )

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. However, the parties concede that paragraph 3 of the “ordered” section of the order on appeal contains a scrivener’s error. Accordingly, we remand so that the order- reflects counsels’ stated agreement that the child, A.S.H., would time share when he was willing to do so, but that' the child, A.C.H., would follow (one (1) day a week for four (4) hours).

Affirmed. Remanded to correct scrivener’s error.

SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and LUCAS, JJ., concur. • -