Milton R. Hinson v. the State of Texas ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed September 9, 2021
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    ___________
    No. 11-21-00167-CR
    ___________
    MILTON R. HINSON, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 350th District Court
    Taylor County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 14942-D
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Milton R. Hinson has filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order denying his
    motion to disqualify the judge of the trial court. In the notice of appeal, Appellant
    requests that this court review the ruling made by Presiding Judge Dean Rucker
    regarding the disqualification of Judge Thomas M. Wheeler. We dismiss the appeal.
    When this appeal was filed, the clerk of this court wrote to Appellant and
    informed him that it did not appear that the order from which he was attempting to
    appeal was a final, appealable order. We requested that Appellant respond and show
    grounds to continue the appeal. Appellant has not filed a response showing any
    grounds upon which this appeal may be continued.
    An order denying a motion to recuse is not a final, appealable order; it may be
    reviewed only in an appeal from a final judgment. Green v. State, 
    374 S.W.3d 434
    ,
    445 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). Likewise, an order denying a motion to disqualify is
    not a final, appealable order and may not be appealed by way of an interlocutory
    appeal. Means v. State, 
    825 S.W.2d 260
     (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no
    pet.). Because Appellant has attempted to appeal from an interlocutory order
    denying a motion to disqualify, we have no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.
    We note that Appellant has filed an “omnibus motion” in which he requests
    (1) an order of transfer to Burnet County Jail, (2) an order for release of the
    documents filed in the cause below, and (3) an order for release of verbatim
    transcripts in the cause below. Because we have no jurisdiction to entertain this
    appeal, we do not reach the merits of Appellant’s omnibus motion, and we dismiss
    it as moot.
    We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    September 9, 2021
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
    Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-21-00167-CR

Filed Date: 9/9/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/11/2021