Ward v. State , 374 S.W.3d 397 ( 2012 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cody L. Ward appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 2 motion. Ward claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to explain why he should waive a preliminary hearing, and that the waiver resulted in Ward not knowing the strength of the State’s evidence. Ward claims his guilty plea was unknowing as a result. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).