United States v. Marquita Meredith ( 2021 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6763
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARQUITA LEIGH MEREDITH, a/k/a Baby Girl,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (4:19-cr-00061-RBS-RJK-
1)
Submitted: November 30, 2021 Decided: December 9, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marquita Leigh Meredith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marquita Leigh Meredith appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release, as well as the court’s orders denying
reconsideration of this ruling. Before seeking compassionate release in the district court,
an inmate must satisfy the threshold requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). However,
as we recently held, this requirement is nonjurisdictional and, thus, subject to forfeiture or
waiver if not timely raised. See United States v. Muhammad, 16 F.4th 126, 129-30 (4th
Cir. 2021).
Here, the district court sua sponte raised the threshold requirement and denied
Meredith’s compassionate release motion on the basis that she did not satisfy it. In light
of our ruling in Muhammad, we hold that the district court erred in so denying Meredith’s
motion. * See id. at 130. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s initial, dispositive
order and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
*
We offer no criticism of the district court, which did not have the benefit of our
ruling in Muhammad when it reached this conclusion.
2