Jacob Bergeron v. J.C. Hacker ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                 United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 20-5299                                               September Term, 2020
    1:20-cv-01864-UNA
    Filed On: April 2, 2021
    Jacob Andrew Bergeron,
    Appellant
    v.
    J.C. Hacker, Of Atlanta, Federal Bureau of
    Investigation, et al.,
    Appellees
    ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    BEFORE:       Rogers, Wilkins, and Rao, Circuit Judges
    JUDGMENT
    This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
    for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.
    34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
    ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed July 28, 2020,
    and September 9, 2020, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the
    complaint as frivolous. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (e)(2)(B); Neitzke v. Williams, 
    490 U.S. 319
    , 325 (1989) (explaining that a complaint is frivolous “where it lacks an arguable
    basis either in law or in fact”). Appellant has not shown any abuse of discretion in the
    district court’s denial of reconsideration. See Firestone v. Firestone, 
    76 F.3d 1205
    ,
    1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Additionally, appellant has not shown that the
    district court erred in striking the amended complaint. Appellant had not sought leave
    of the court to file the amended complaint, as required by Federal Rule of Civil
    Procedure 15. Moreover, the proposed amendment would have been futile. See
    Hettinga v. United States, 
    677 F.3d 471
    , 480 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (“A district
    court may deny a motion to amend a complaint as futile if the proposed claim would not
    survive a motion to dismiss.”).
    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 20-5299                                                September Term, 2020
    Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
    is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
    of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
    P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
    Per Curiam
    FOR THE COURT:
    Mark J. Langer, Clerk
    BY:     /s/
    Michael C. McGrail
    Deputy Clerk
    Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-5299

Filed Date: 4/2/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/2/2021