In re Ballot Dispute in Election of Town of Winslow District 3 Town Councilor , 2018 ME 2 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • MAINE	SUPREME	JUDICIAL	COURT	                                       Reporter	of	Decisions
    Decision:	 
    2018 ME 2
    Docket:	   SJC-17-8
    Decided:	  January	11,	2018
    Panel:	    SAUFLEY,	C.J.,	and	ALEXANDER,	MEAD,	GORMAN,	JABAR,	HJELM,	and	HUMPHREY,	JJ.
    IN	RE	BALLOT	DISPUTE	IN	ELECTION	OF	TOWN	OF	WINSLOW
    DISTRICT	3	TOWN	COUNCILOR
    JUDGMENT	OF	THE	COURT
    [¶1]	 	 The	 Town	 Clerk	 of	 Winslow,	 after	 conducting	 a	 vote	 recount,
    tabulated	the	results	and	concluded	that	there	was	a	single	disputed	ballot	in
    the	race	for	a	Town	Council	seat	in	District	3	in	Winslow	in	the	November	7,
    2017,	election.		Because	that	single	disputed	ballot	could	make	a	difference	in
    the	 election,	 we	 have	 original	 jurisdiction	 to	 determine	 the	 result	 of	 the
    election.		See	21-A	M.R.S.	§	737-A(10)	(2017).		Having	considered	the	facts	and
    the	applicable	law,	we	find	and	conclude	that	the	marks	on	the	disputed	ballot
    fail	to	disclose	the	voter’s	intent	to	vote	for	either	candidate.		Accordingly,	we
    enter	 the	 following	 decision	 in	 which	 we	 confirm	 that	 Jerry	 A.	 Quirion	 was
    elected	to	the	Town	Council	for	District	3.
    I.		FACTS	AND	BACKGROUND
    [¶2]	 	 We	 sit	 as	 the	 trial	 court	 in	 this	 matter;	 however,	 no	 facts	 are	 in
    dispute	 except	 as	 to	 the	 intention	 of	 the	 voter	 who	 completed	 the	 single
    2
    disputed	ballot.		The	initial	results	of	the	November	7,	2017,	election	for	 the
    office	of	District	3	Town	Councilor	in	Winslow	were	reported	as	173	votes	for
    Jerry	A.	Quirion	and	170	votes	for	Lee	A.	Trahan.		Upon	the	request	of	Trahan,
    the	clerk	or	the	clerk’s	designee	scheduled	a	recount,	which	was	held	ten	days
    after	 the	 election.	 	 See	 21-A	 M.R.S.	 §	737-A(3),	 (4)	 (2017);	 30-A	M.R.S.
    §	2531-B	 (2017);	 see	 also 30-A	M.R.S.	 §	2501(1)	 (2017)	 (“When	 Title	 21-A
    applies	to	any	municipal	election,	the	municipal	clerk	shall	perform	the	duties
    of	the	Secretary	of	State	prescribed	by	Title	21-A.”).
    [¶3]		The	Town	Clerk	supervised	the	recount,	at	which	both	candidates
    were	 present	 with	 their	 representatives.	 	 See	 21-A	M.R.S.	 §	737-A	 (2017).
    After	 applying	 the	 Secretary	 of	 State’s	 rules	 for	 determining	 voter	 intent,	 8A
    C.M.R.	 29	 250	 550-1	 to	 -3	 (2010);	 see	 21-A	 M.R.S.	 §	 696(6)	 (2017),	 two
    additional	 ballots	 were	 identified	 as	 votes	 for	 Trahan	 because	 checkmarks
    were	placed	next	to	his	name,	and	one	disputed	ballot	was	segregated	by	the
    municipal	 clerk	 or	 designee.	 	 See	 8A	 C.M.R.	 29	 250	 550-2,	 §	4(1)(A)(2);
    21-A	M.R.S.	§	737-A(7).		The	final	vote	count	stated	in	the	recount	tabulation
    was	 173	 votes	 for	 Quirion	 and	 172	 votes	 for	 Trahan,	 with	 thirty-eight	 blank
    votes	and	one	disputed	ballot.
    3
    [¶4]		Because	“there	are	enough	challenged	or	disputed	ballots	to	affect
    the	result	of	an	election,”	the	municipal	clerk,	upon	our	order,	delivered	a	copy
    of	 the	 disputed	 ballot	 to	 us	 for	 review,	 and	 we	 invited	 memoranda	 from	 the
    candidates.	 	 21-A	 M.R.S.	 §	 737-A(10);	 see	 also	 In	 re	 Primary	 Election	 Ballot
    Dispute	 2008,	 
    2008 ME 117
    ,	 ¶	 6,	 
    955 A.2d 216
    .	 	 Having	 received	 a
    memorandum	from	Quirion,	and	Trahan	having	waived	the	opportunity	to	file
    a	memorandum,	we	now	review	the	disputed	ballot	and	“determine	the	result
    of	the	election.”		21-A	M.R.S.	§	737-A(10).		Our	decision	“is	final	and	must	be
    certified	to	the	Governor	by	the	Chief	Justice.”		21-A	M.R.S.	§	737-A(10).
    II.		DISCUSSION
    A.	    The	Disputed	Ballot
    [¶5]		The	ballot	that	the	Town	prepared	for	voters	required	that	a	voter,
    to	 cast	 a	 vote	 for	 an	 individual,	 “fill	 in	 the	 oval	 to	 the	 left.”	 	 For	 the	 office	 of
    District	3	Town	Councilor,	the	ballot	directed,	“Vote	for	ONE”	of	the	two	listed
    candidates.	 	 On	 the	 disputed	 ballot,	 a	 copy	 of	 which	 is	 appended	 to	 this
    decision,	 the	 voter	 placed	 multiple	 marks	 in	 black	 boxes	 that	 appear	 in	 the
    margins	of	the	ballot,	but	the	voter	did	not	mark	any	ovals	on	the	entire	ballot.
    With	respect	to	the	race	for	District	3	Town	Council,	there	is	a	mark	in	the	left
    margin	beside	the	outlined	box	containing	Quirion’s	name	and	another	mark
    4
    beside	 the	 box	 containing	 Trahan’s	 name.	 	 Unlike	 some	 of	 the	 voter’s	 other
    marks	 in	 the	 margins,	 neither	 of	 these	 marks	 is	 in	 the	 shape	 of	 an	 oval	 or
    circle.		The	mark	in	the	margin	beside	Trahan’s	name	is	nearer	to	the	oval,	but
    it	 appears	 less	 like	 an	 oval	 and	 more	 like	 a	 scribble	 than	 the	 mark	 beside
    Quirion’s	name.
    B.	    Application	of	the	Law
    [¶6]		“If	a	voter	marks	more	names	for	an	office	than	there	are	vacancies
    to	be	filled	or	more	choices	for	a	question	than	are	permitted,	the	voter’s	vote
    for	 that	 office	 or	 question	 may	 not	 be	 counted.”	 	 21-A	 M.R.S.	 §	 696(2)(A)
    (2017);	see	8A	C.M.R.	29	250	550-2	§	3(2).		A	vote	will	also	not	be	counted	“[i]f
    a	 voter	 marks	 the	 voter’s	 ballot	 in	 such	 a	 manner	 that	 it	 is	 impossible	 to
    determine	 the	 voter’s	 choice.”	 	 21-A	M.R.S.	 §	 696(2)(B)	 (2017);	 8A	 C.M.R.
    29	250	550-2	§	4.
    [¶7]	 	 Based	 on	 the	 appearance	 of	 the	 ambiguous	 marks	 in	 the	 margin
    next	 to	 the	 boxes	 containing	 each	 of	 the	 candidates’	 names,	 we	 find	 and
    conclude	 that	 it	 is	 impossible	 to	 determine	 the	 voter’s	 choice,	 and	 therefore
    the	vote	cannot	be	counted	for	either	candidate.		See	21-A	M.R.S.	§	696(2)(A),
    (B);	 see	 8A	 C.M.R.	 29	 250	 550-2	 §§	 3(2),	 4;	 cf.	 In	 re	 Primary	 Election	 Ballot
    Disputes	2004,	
    2004 ME 99
    ,	¶	35,	
    857 A.2d 494
    	(holding	that	a	mark	in	an	oval
    5
    was	“a	stray	mark,”	not	a	vote	for	the	candidate).		As	a	result,	the	Town	Clerk’s
    final	certified	tabulation	of	the	votes	for	each	candidate	is	not	augmented	by
    counting	 the	 disputed	 ballot	 for	 either	 candidate,	 and	 the	 Chief	 Justice	 will
    certify	 to	 the	 Governor	 that	 Jerry	 A.	 Quirion	 was	 elected	 to	 the	 office	 of
    District	3	Town	Councilor	in	the	Town	of	Winslow	on	November	7,	2017,	by	a
    vote	of	173	for	Quirion	and	172	for	Trahan.
    Dated:	January	11,	2018
    /s/
    LEIGH	I.	SAUFLEY
    Chief	Justice
    /s/
    DONALD	G.	ALEXANDER
    Associate	Justice
    /s/
    ANDREW	M.	MEAD
    Associate	Justice
    /s/
    ELLEN	A.	GORMAN
    Associate	Justice
    /s/
    JOSEPH	M.	JABAR
    Associate	Justice
    6
    /s/
    JEFFREY	L.	HJELM
    Associate	Justice
    /s/
    THOMAS	E.	HUMPHREY
    Associate	Justice
    Ronald	W.	Bourget,	Esq.,	Law	Offices	of	Ronald	W.	Bourget,	Augusta,	for	Jerry
    A.	Quirion
    Lee	A.	Trahan	did	not	file	a	memorandum
    STATE	OF	MAINE		         	     	      	       	      SUPREME	JUDICIAL	COURT
    Docket	No.	SJC-17-8
    IN	RE	BALLOT	DISPUTE	IN	ELECTION	OF	TOWN	OF	WINSLOW
    DISTRICT	3	TOWN	COUNCILOR
    Consistent	 with	 the	 decision	 of	 the	 Maine	 Supreme	 Judicial	 Court
    regarding	the	ballot	dispute	in	the	above-captioned	matter,	I	hereby	certify	to
    Governor	 Paul	 R.	 LePage	 that	 Jerry	 A.	 Quirion	 was	 elected	 to	 the	 office	 of
    District	3	Town	Councilor	in	the	Town	of	Winslow	on	November	7,	2017,	by	a
    vote	of	173	for	Quirion	and	172	for	Lee	A.	Trahan.
    Dated:		January	11,	2018	      	      	       	      /s/
    LEIGH	I.	SAUFLEY
    Chief	Justice
    

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 2018 ME 2

Filed Date: 1/11/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/11/2018