NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
Um'ted States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
STEPHANIE R. JONES,
Petitioner,
V.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent.
2012-3120
Petition for review of the Merit Systerns Protection
Board in case no. DA0752110468-I-1.
ON MOTION
ORDER
The Department of the Army (Army) moves to reform
the caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as
the respondent
Pursuant to
5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is
designated as the respondent when the Board's decision
concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. In this
case, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of
STEPH.ANIE JONES V. MSPB
jurisdiction Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in
this petition for review.
Accordingly,
I'r ls ORI)ERED THAT:
The motion to reform the official caption is granted.
The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board
should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing
of this order.
JUL 1 6 2012
Date
cc: Stephanie J ones
Matthew F. Scarlato, Esq.
Nicole DeCrescenzo, Esq.
s21
FOR THE COURT
/S/ Jan H@rbal;,; n
J an Horbaly
Clerk
|LED
ve,e";;§s§.l*‘.§.§%%f°“
JU|`_ 1 6 2012
JAN HORBALY
CI.ERK
