Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ( 2012 )

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, V. SAMSUNG ELECTRON]CS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRON"ICS AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, Defenclants-Appellants. 2012-1506 Appeal from the United States District C0urt for the Northern District of California in case no. 11-CV-1846, Judge Lucy H. Koh. ON MOTION Before BRYsoN, PROST, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURLAM. ORDER Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. move to expedite the appeal. Apple Inc. responds. APPLE INC. V SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 2 Samsung may of course significantly self-expedite the case by filing its own brief early. Samsung, however, has not shown that the time for Apple to file its brief should be shortened. Apple should not anticipate any extensions of time to file its brief. Ora1 argument, if deemed neces- sary by the court, will be scheduled by subsequent order of the court. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion to expedite is denied. FOR THE COURT 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Kathleen M. Sullivan, Esq. Michael A. Jacobs, Esq. s19 F|LED \»=~,¢.=.'ztssrase€°“ JUL l 9 2012 JAN HOBBAL¥ CLEHK