Walsh v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs , 421 F. App'x 969 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • NOTE: This order is 110nprecedentia1.
    United States Court of AppeaIs
    for the FederaI Circuit
    ROBERT A. WALSH,
    Cla1Lman,t-Appellant,
    V.
    ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS
    AFFAIRS, `
    Respondent-Appellee.
    2009-7143
    Appea1 from the United States C0urt of Appea1s for
    Veterans Claims in 07-3548, Judge William A. Moorman.
    ON MOTION
    Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOUR1E and O'MALLEY,
    Circuit Judges.
    PER CURLA_M.
    0 R D E R
    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to vacate the
    judgment of the United States Court of Appea1s for Veter-
    ams C1aims and to remand for further proceedingS.
    WALSH V. DVA 2
    The appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Court
    of Veterans Claims more than 120 days after the Board of
    Veterans’ Appeals mailed its decision in his case. That
    court dismissed the appeal as untirnely, concluding that
    the 120-day appeal period established by 
    38 U.S.C. § 7266
    (a) for seeking review of Board of Veterans’ Appeals
    decisions is jurisdictional and not subject to equitable
    tolling. The appellant sought this court's review.
    This court stayed the briefing schedule in this appeal
    pending the United States Supreme Court’s review of our
    decision in Henderson v. Shinseki, 
    589 F.3d 1201
     (Fed.
    Cir. 2009) (en banc) (affirming Court of Appeals for Vet-
    erans Claims determination that period to appeal to that
    court is not subject to equitable tol1ing). In Henders0n ex
    rel. Henderson u. Shinseki, 
    131 S.Ct. 1197
     (2011), the
    Supreme Court reversed this court’s decision and con-
    cluded that the 120-day deadline for filing an appeal with
    the Court of Appea1s for Veterans Claims does not have
    jurisdictional consequences. Because the Court of Ap-
    peals for Veterans Claims erred in concluding that the
    appeal deadline established by § 7266(a) is jurisdictional,
    we vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’
    judgment and remand for further proceedings.
    Accordingly,
    IT ls ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The motion is granted The judgment is vacated
    and the case is remanded for further proceedings
    (2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
    3 WALSH V. DVA
    FoR THE CoUR'r
    2 5  /s/ Jan Horbal__v
    Date J an Horbaly
    Clerk
    cc: Robert A. Walsh
    Tara K. Hogan, Esq.
    s2O
    Issued As A Mandate: j j hAY 25
    men
    U»3. UUURT
    THE FEDF:g
    |‘1Al 2 5 2011
    .|ANI'DRBAl!
    €I.ElI£
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2009-7143

Citation Numbers: 421 Fed. Appx. 969, 421 F. App'x 969

Judges: Lourie, Prost, Rader

Filed Date: 5/25/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023