Wireless Ink Corporation v. Google, Inc. ( 2014 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WIRELESS INK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, AND FACEBOOK, INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND YOUTUBE, INC., AND MYSPACE, INC., Defendants. ---------------------- WIRELESS INK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FACEBOOK, INC. AND GOOGLE, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2013-1683, -1684 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Nos. 11-cv-01751 and 10-cv-01841, Judge P. Kevin Castel. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JEREMY S. PITCOCK, The Pitcock Law Group, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of coun- sel on the brief was PAPOOL S. CHAUDHARI, Chaudhari Law, PLLC, of Wylie, Texas. JOHN CHRISTOPHER ROZENDAAL, Kellogg, Huber, Han- sen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for Facebook, Inc., were MICHAEL E. JOFFRE and MELANIE L. BOSTWICK. Of counsel on the brief for Facebook, Inc., were HEIDI L. KEEFE, MARK R. WEINSTEIN, and ELIZABETH L. STAMESHKIN, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, California. On the brief for Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC, were KEVIN X. MCGANN, AARON CHASE, and ADAM GAHTAN, White & Case LLP, of New York, New York. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court