Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp. ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    APELDYN CORPORATION,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    V.
    AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION ANI)
    AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA,"
    Defendants-Appellees,
    AND
    CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPOl-{ATION
    AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC.,
    Defendcznts-Appellees,
    AND
    SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
    SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
    Defendants.
    2012-1172
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    District of Delaware in case n0. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L.
    Robinson.
    APELDYN CORP V. AU OPTRON.[CS 2
    APELDYN CORPORATION,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    V.
    AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND
    AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA,
    Defendcznts-Appellees,
    AND
    CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION
    AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC.,
    Defendants-Appellees,
    AND
    SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
    SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
    Defendants.
    2012-1173
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    District of Delaware in case no. (}8-CV-0568, Judge Sue L.
    Robinson.
    ON MOTION
    ORDER
    Apeldyn Corporation ("Apeldyn") m0ves, unopp0sed,
    for an extension of tirne. Specifically, Apeldyn requests
    that its deadline to designate materials for the appendix
    and to file its statement of issues be extended to August 6,
    2012; that its deadline to file its certificate of compliance
    3 APELDYN CORP V. AU OPTRONICS
    with Federal Circuit Rule 11(d) be extended to Septem-
    ber 7, 2012; and that its deadline to file its opening brief
    be extended to September 21, 2012. Apeldyn also moves
    to withdraw its appeal from the district court order dis-
    qualifying McKenna Long & Aldridge ("l\/IcKenna Long")
    from representing Apeldyn against Samsung, appeal
    2012-11'73. McKenna Long moves to withdraw as counsel
    for Apeldyn.
    Upon consideration thereof,
    lT IS ORDERED THATI
    (1) Apeldyn’s motion for an extension of time is
    granted
    (2) Apeldyn’s motion to withdraw appeal 2012-1173 is
    granted Appeal 2012-1173 is dismissed. Each side shall
    bear its own costs in 2012-1173. The revised official
    caption in 2012-1172 is reflected above.
    (3) McKenna Long’s motion to withdraw as counsel for
    Apeldyn is granted.
    (4) All other pending motions are denied as moot.
    FoR THE CoURT
    /s/ Jan Horbal
    Date J an Horbaly
    Clerk
    cc: Gaspare J. Bono, Esq.
    Don H. Marmaduke, Esq. F"_EPP
    Terrence Duane Garnett, Esq. U.S.TE|%\%|§BE§AL CHI-imm
    . Donald R. McPhail, Esq. a , _,
    N@ii Phiiiip siroca, Esq. JUL 06 ¢W
    JAN HOBBA|.Y
    CLERK
    APELDYN CORP V. AU OPTRONICS 4
    s25
    issUED As A MANDATE cas no 2012-1173 only); JUL 0 5 2513
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2012-1172

Filed Date: 7/6/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014