Motions Systems Corp. v. Bush[non-Precedential Order] , 140 F. App'x 257 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                     NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this order
    is not citable as precedent. It is a public order.
    United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    04-1428
    MOTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States,
    and ROBERT B. ZOELLICK, United States Trade Representative,
    Defendants-Appellees,
    and
    CCL INDUSTRIAL MOTOR LTD.,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, RADER,
    SCHALL, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
    ORDER
    PER CURIAM.
    This case, having been argued before a panel of three judges on March 7, 2005,
    and thereafter having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active
    service and a poll having been requested and taken,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    This case be heard en banc.
    The parties are to submit additional briefs addressing the following issues:
    (1)    Is the President an "officer" under the terms of 
    28 U.S.C. § 1581
    (i) and is
    the President's action under 
    19 U.S.C. § 2451
     subject to judicial review in
    a suit against the President? See Franklin v. Massachusetts, 
    505 U.S. 788
     (2000); Mississippi v. Johnson, 
    71 U.S. 475
     (1866).
    (2)    Is there any constitutional barrier that would preclude the Court of
    International Trade from issuing the requested injunctive relief against the
    President? See Franklin v. Massachusetts, 
    505 U.S. 788
     (2000); Dalton
    v. Spector, 
    511 U.S. 462
     (1994); Mississippi v. Johnson, 
    71 U.S. 475
    (1866).
    (3)    Should Corus Group PLC v. Int'l Trade Comm'n., 
    352 F.3d 1351
     (Fed. Cir.
    2003) be overruled en banc insofar as it holds that § 1581(i) does not
    authorize relief against the President?
    (4)    Under the terms of § 1581(i) and § 2451, is the relief requested against
    the United States Trade Representative available in this case?
    This case will be heard en banc on the basis of the briefs already filed and
    additional briefs addressing the issues set forth above. An original and thirty copies of
    additional briefs shall be filed, and two copies served on opposing counsel. Such
    additional briefs shall be filed simultaneously by the parties, forty-five days from the date
    of this Order, and shall not exceed 7,000 words in length. Briefs of amici curiae will be
    entertained in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 and Federal
    Circuit Rule 29.
    Oral argument is scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 6, 2005, in
    Courtroom 201. Counsel for each side shall have 30 minutes to argue.
    FOR THE COURT
    ___July 15, 2005_______                           __________________________
    Date                                                   Jan Horbaly
    Clerk
    04-1428                                   2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2004-1428

Citation Numbers: 140 F. App'x 257

Judges: Bryson, Clevenger, Dyk, Gajarsa, Linn, Lourie, Mayer, Michel, Newman, Per Curiam, Rader, Schall

Filed Date: 7/15/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023